- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:00:22 -0700
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
So the issue is that SKOS doesn't manage complex or compound entries well. In other words, you can give a pre-coordinated heading a URI (as LC did for LCSH) but there isn't a way to separately code the parts of that heading. At least, that's what I understand the problem was for LCSH. kc Quoting Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 07:55:05AM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> It has always amazed me how library people are allergic to any >> terminological >> generalization of "pre-coordination" (it's about assembling different >> concepts together, no? So a kind of combination...). Anyway, what was >> bothering me is that the previously written "concept coordination" was >> looking too vague while denoting a quite precise thing ("concept" here is >> much more precise than many other occurrences of the same word in >> the rest of >> the text). Having an all-precise wording such as "pre-coordinated subject >> heading" is also very fine by me! >> >> Changes made at >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_recommendations_page_take2&diff=6287&oldid=6269 > > Antoine, > > The only problem with this new wording: > > [SKOS]... does not include mechanisms for representing > pre-coordinated subject headings... > > is that "SKOS" (or RDF) does in fact include a "mechanism for representing > pre-coordinated subject headings": you simply give them URIs! A wording like > "representing the component concepts of pre-coordinated subject > headings" gets > closer, but there, too, one could argue that you just give the concepts URIs > (not that those concepts are necessarily related to the > pre-coordinated subject > headings, if you see what I mean). In other words, that wording > doesn't quite > capture what you wanted to say, Antoine, with "combining concepts". > > If I can think of a better wording, I'll post it... Maybe something like > "representing pre-coordinated subject headings as combinations of component > concepts"...? > > Tom > > -- > Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org> > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:00:59 UTC