Re: Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT

On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Emmanuelle Bermes wrote:
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:03:05 +0200
> From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
> To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
> Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? -
>  IMPORTANT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAODLZ4gue9Y-czgFjjQj3JF5WWjqWCdMbEM6jmW0spZsxzthuw@mail.gmail.com>
> Sender: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org
> 
> It's not a good idea though to completely abandon the reference to
> managers. 

+1

> What about "library managers and thought leaders" ? too long

+1 - seems a bit long...

Tom


> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote:
> >> I can't remember what this started out as, but both "leaders" and
> >> "leadership" will probably be understood as "library directors and
> >> other management types." If we want it to mean "thought leaders" or
> >> "technology leaders" then we'll need those adjectives to be there. IMO.
> >
> > I'd support "thought leaders". Anyone can be a thought leader, even if they have no formal leadership position. To me, "leadership" does have a notion of "management position".
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Lars
> >
> >  **** Bitte beachten Sie die neue Internet- und E-Mail-Adresse. ****
> >  **** Please note my new internet- and email-address. ****
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Lars G. Svensson
> > Deutsche Nationalbibliothek / Informationstechnik
> > http://www.dnb.de/
> > l.svensson@dnb.de
> >
> >
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org]
> >> Im Auftrag von Karen Coyle
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 01:31
> >> An: public-xg-lld@w3.org
> >> Betreff: [Spam-Wahrscheinlichkeit=45]Re: "Design user stories and
> >> models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
> >>
> >> I can't remember what this started out as, but both "leaders" and
> >> "leadership" will probably be understood as "library directors and
> >> other management types." If we want it to mean "thought leaders" or
> >> "technology leaders" then we'll need those adjectives to be there. IMO.
> >>
> >> kc
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Quoting Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >> >> >I think of "leaders" not just as formal leaders, but as including,
> >> >> for example
> >> >> >"thought leaders"...
> >> >>
> >> >> To make that clear, it would have to be worded "thought leaders."
> >> >
> >> > You agree, then, that "leaders" will be read as leaders in a formal
> >> > sense, and that "leadership" is better as a heading of the section
> >> > "For library leadership"?
> >> >
> >> > Tom
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Karen Coyle
> >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> >> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> >> m: 1-510-435-8234
> >> skype: kcoylenet
> >>
> >
> >
> >

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>

Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:09:57 UTC