- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:03:05 +0200
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
It's not a good idea though to completely abandon the reference to managers. What about "library managers and thought leaders" ? too long ? Emma On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote: >> I can't remember what this started out as, but both "leaders" and >> "leadership" will probably be understood as "library directors and >> other management types." If we want it to mean "thought leaders" or >> "technology leaders" then we'll need those adjectives to be there. IMO. > > I'd support "thought leaders". Anyone can be a thought leader, even if they have no formal leadership position. To me, "leadership" does have a notion of "management position". > > All the best, > > Lars > > **** Bitte beachten Sie die neue Internet- und E-Mail-Adresse. **** > **** Please note my new internet- and email-address. **** > > -- > Dr. Lars G. Svensson > Deutsche Nationalbibliothek / Informationstechnik > http://www.dnb.de/ > l.svensson@dnb.de > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] >> Im Auftrag von Karen Coyle >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 01:31 >> An: public-xg-lld@w3.org >> Betreff: [Spam-Wahrscheinlichkeit=45]Re: "Design user stories and >> models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT >> >> I can't remember what this started out as, but both "leaders" and >> "leadership" will probably be understood as "library directors and >> other management types." If we want it to mean "thought leaders" or >> "technology leaders" then we'll need those adjectives to be there. IMO. >> >> kc >> >> >> >> Quoting Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>: >> >> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: >> >> >I think of "leaders" not just as formal leaders, but as including, >> >> for example >> >> >"thought leaders"... >> >> >> >> To make that clear, it would have to be worded "thought leaders." >> > >> > You agree, then, that "leaders" will be read as leaders in a formal >> > sense, and that "leadership" is better as a heading of the section >> > "For library leadership"? >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > -- >> > Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >> ph: 1-510-540-7596 >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 08:03:42 UTC