- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:29:26 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On 9/6/11 5:44 PM, Tom Baker wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:16:38AM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> Hmm, meanwhile, I've come to terms with the current wording. >> But as I promised it, here's a try (not implemented yet): >> [ >> In defining rights for data, owners must strike a balance between the value they perceive for protecting their investment and the impact of usage restrictions, as restrictions only complicate the re-use of data in a Linked Data environment. >> ] > > I like it. It looks to me like stating the obvious - something that is left > implicit in the section as currently written and should be made explicit. > > I note that this is in a section addressed to "library leaders", and this point addresses > "owners". Maybe the sentence: > > It makes sense to seek agreement about rights and licensing at the level of... > > ...should be just a bit more explicit (i.e., "who" should seek agreement?): > > It makes sense for library leaders to seek agreement with owners about rights and licensing at the level of... > > ??? OK, thanks for the suggestion! Done at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_recommendations_page_take2&diff=6248&oldid=6221 Antoine
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 19:27:19 UTC