- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:51:29 -0400
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:12:10PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: > I have two important caveats, though: > - I'd be tempted to replace RDF by "Linked Data" in the heading, according to our "be as RDF-neutral as possible". +1 > Similarly, in the "HTTP URIs" bullet I'd replace "RDF schemas" by "machine-readable specifications (e.g., using OWL)". +1 - or just "machine-readable specifications" - or couldn't that be "machine-readable representations"? > - I do like the original label "namespace policies". I'd recommend fitting it > back into the second sentence: "Such "namespace policies" encourage a > consistent, coherent [etc]. +1 - using it in quotes is fine, and the "such" tells the reader it is defined in the previous sentence > I hope this helps, Yes, very good. Tom -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 15:52:01 UTC