- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:12:10 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Argh, why have I accepted to check this section ;-) To try and sum my position re the sub-sections on URI creation and management: I do agree with most of the content and the wording at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_recommendations_page_take2&oldid=6220#For_data_and_systems_designers Especially, I'm ok with removing the last paragraph of "Create URIs for the items in library datasets" and the general use of "namespace" in "Develop policies for managing RDF vocabularies and their URIs". I have two important caveats, though: - I'd be tempted to replace RDF by "Linked Data" in the heading, according to our "be as RDF-neutral as possible". Similarly, in the "HTTP URIs" bullet I'd replace "RDF schemas" by "machine-readable specifications (e.g., using OWL)". - I do like the original label "namespace policies". I'd recommend fitting it back into the second sentence: "Such "namespace policies" encourage a consistent, coherent [etc]. I hope this helps, Antoine
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 11:10:04 UTC