- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:24:25 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
>>>>>> -- Removed reference to "Good practice guidelines and recipes for constructing >>>>>> ontologies and structured vocabularies." -- out of place here. >>>> >>>> Not sure it's irrelevant : best practices would be needed when we're >>>> talking about providing URIs for a vocabulary which wasn't primarily >>>> designed for the Semantic Web (e.g. RDA) >>> >>> I do not think the point it irrelevant; it just seems out of place in a >>> paragraph that focuses on managing RDF vocabularies and URIs. Maybe it could >>> be turned into a full sentence and added to the end of the point on "Develop >>> library data standards that are compatible with Linked Data" [2]. >> >> Point taken, it would make sense. > > How about, at the end of the point on "Develop library data standrds": > > There is a need for best-practice documentation and recipes to guide > participants in library-world standardization efforts in the construction of ontologies > and structured vocabularies. > > In context: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_recommendations_page_take2&diff=6193&oldid=6191 I'm ok with that. It certainly fits this section better. I'm not so fond of the (lack of) transition with the other sentences on data on general, but I can live with it. Especially, given the fact that this recommendation is quite trivial (it applies for any domain), I would be reluctant to put more emphasis on it... Antoine
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 11:22:28 UTC