Re: "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter! from Tom Baker on 2011-09-05 (public-xg-lld@w3.org from September 2011)

From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:17:08 -0400
To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
Cc: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110905001708.GC23129@julius>

On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 07:08:48PM -0400, Jeff Young wrote:
> The last sentence didn't make sense to me, so I reworded it. RDFa can
> presumably represent anything that RDF can, so the intention was
> probably to accommodate the other options. I whittled it down a bit.
> Double check to see if it still seems reasonable:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Relevant_Technologies&diff=6160&oldid=6159

Thank you, Jeff. That makes the point very clear!

Tom

Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 00:17:51 UTC