"Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter! from Tom Baker on 2011-09-04 (public-xg-lld@w3.org from September 2011)

From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:31:27 -0400
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110904223127.GA19278@julius>

Some clarifications to [1]:

-- "Schema.org" is the name (not "http://schema.org"). Ditto "Schema.RDFS.org."

Questions:

-- "Though in principle extensible, the microdata schemas would require a lot of extension..."?
   Was the more cryptic: "Though _it_ is in principle extensible _it_ would require..."

-- Did not understand: "Modulo bugs in the search engines' parsers it is even
   possible to do both in the same web page."  Took this to mean:

       But for bugs in the search engines' parsers, it should even be possible
       to do both in the same Web page. 

I would appreciate a careful look at the diff [1]...

Tom

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Relevant_Technologies&diff=6158&oldid=6157

Received on Sunday, 4 September 2011 22:31:57 UTC