- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 12:21:10 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Done! http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6089&oldid=6087 Thx, Antoine > See suggested changes under the original text: > > > On 9/2/11 9:57 AM, "Tom Baker"<tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote: > > Original: International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) > > --- International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions > (IFLA) > > > > Original: the client-server protocolo Z39.50 > > --- the information retrieval protocol Z39.50 > > > Marcia > > Source: > http://www.ifla.org/ > http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39.50_Resources > > > > On 9/2/11 9:57 AM, "Tom Baker"<tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote: > >> I'd like some additional eyes on edits I made to one particular >> sub-section >> of The Current Situation [1], which previously read: >> >> Many library standards, such as MARC or Z39.50, have been developed >> or are >> developed in a library-specific context. Standardization in libraries >> is >> often undertaken by bodies only dedicated to the domain, such as IFLA >> or >> the JSC for development of RDA. By encouraging these bodies to broaden >> their scope or to liaise with other standardization bodies, Linked >> Data >> creates an opportunity to expand the context and utility of such >> standards >> to relevant data created and used by other communities. >> >> ...and now reads: >> >> Many library standards, such as the MAchine-Readable Cataloging format >> (MARC) or the client-server protocolo Z39.50, have been (or continue >> to be) >> developed in a library-specific context. Standardization in the >> library >> world is often undertaken by bodies focused exclusively on the library >> domain, such as the International Federation of Library Associations >> (IFLA) >> or the Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource >> Description >> and Access (RDA). By broadening their scope or liaising with other >> standardization bodies, such as W3C, bodies such as these can expand >> the >> relevance and applicability of their standards to data created and >> used by >> other communities. >> >> Note: >> >> -- US spelling of "cataloging," which I have now also changed in Benefits >> [2] and >> ConversionStyle [3] (after consulting with Gordon). >> -- Full expansion of acronyms or, in the case of Z39.50, an adjective >> saying what >> it is. >> -- Corrected a final sentence which said that "Linked Data" would itself >> act to >> "encourage standardization bodies". >> >> It would be great if one or two of you could give the paragraph a careful >> read... >> >> Tom >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_pag >> e_take2&diff=6083&oldid=6082 >> [2] >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Benefits&diff=60 >> 84&oldid=6065 >> [3] >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=ConversionStyle& >> diff=6085&oldid=6069 >> > >
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 10:19:22 UTC