- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 23:16:21 -0400
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:39:58PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:34:07PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: > >>It calls itself "Joint Steering Committee for the Development of > >>RDA," so the acronym appears in the name as an acronym. I think we > >>should use it in the way the JSC does. > > > >Yeah, that's what I was sort of thinking too. But where would we > >expand "RDA", or do we really need to? > > Perhaps we should organize it so we mention RDA first, expanded and > with acronym, before we mention JSC. What section are you in? The first reference to RDA I see is [1]. For the overall context, see [2]. Tom [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page_take2#Library_standards_are_designed_only_for_the_library_community [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 03:17:19 UTC