- From: ZENG, MARCIA <mzeng@kent.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:12:17 -0400
- To: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
See suggested changes under the original text: On 9/2/11 9:57 AM, "Tom Baker" <tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote: Original: International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) --- International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) Original: the client-server protocolo Z39.50 --- the information retrieval protocol Z39.50 Marcia Source: http://www.ifla.org/ http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39.50_Resources On 9/2/11 9:57 AM, "Tom Baker" <tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote: >I'd like some additional eyes on edits I made to one particular >sub-section >of The Current Situation [1], which previously read: > > Many library standards, such as MARC or Z39.50, have been developed >or are > developed in a library-specific context. Standardization in libraries >is > often undertaken by bodies only dedicated to the domain, such as IFLA >or > the JSC for development of RDA. By encouraging these bodies to broaden > their scope or to liaise with other standardization bodies, Linked >Data > creates an opportunity to expand the context and utility of such >standards > to relevant data created and used by other communities. > >...and now reads: > > Many library standards, such as the MAchine-Readable Cataloging format > (MARC) or the client-server protocolo Z39.50, have been (or continue >to be) > developed in a library-specific context. Standardization in the >library > world is often undertaken by bodies focused exclusively on the library > domain, such as the International Federation of Library Associations >(IFLA) > or the Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource >Description > and Access (RDA). By broadening their scope or liaising with other > standardization bodies, such as W3C, bodies such as these can expand >the > relevance and applicability of their standards to data created and >used by > other communities. > >Note: > >-- US spelling of "cataloging," which I have now also changed in Benefits >[2] and > ConversionStyle [3] (after consulting with Gordon). >-- Full expansion of acronyms or, in the case of Z39.50, an adjective >saying what > it is. >-- Corrected a final sentence which said that "Linked Data" would itself >act to > "encourage standardization bodies". > >It would be great if one or two of you could give the paragraph a careful >read... > >Tom > >[1] >http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_pag >e_take2&diff=6083&oldid=6082 >[2] >http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Benefits&diff=60 >84&oldid=6065 >[3] >http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=ConversionStyle& >diff=6085&oldid=6069 >
Received on Friday, 2 September 2011 16:13:00 UTC