Re: usecases comments Re: Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki

Oops... it appears I'm still getting back into the swing of things after
vacation. Tim's original email was about his comments, and he had posted
comments about wsc-xit as well. I didn't see that mez was only referring to
his comments on the usecases document.

-Ian

On Jan 2, 2008 9:12 AM, Ian Fette <ifette@google.com> wrote:

> Whoa... not ready for "consensus" changes on all of these yet. I haven't
> had a chance yet to go through everyone's comments. I know year-end was
> crazy for me, and I imagine that others had similar experiences, so I don't
> know that it's really safe to assume that silence at the end of the year
> (when people are leaving for holidays etc) implies consensus.
>
> For instance, there was a change saying an attested certificate has been
> validated rather than can be validated - that's not a minor re-wording, that
> is a semantic change, and since we were talking about changes of security
> levels on validation errors, etc, I need a minute to parse whether this
> change is actually affecting anything else.
>
> I would ask for a bit more time before we adopt all of these changes. I
> agree that most are editorial, but I'm not sure I agree on *all* of them
> being so.
>
> -Ian
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 8:50 AM, Mary Ellen Zurko <
> Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Since this is about consensus on (purely) editorial changes to
> > wsc-usecases, I am declaring that two weeks of silence, that included the
> > holidays, is sufficient for these changes. Tyler, as editor, please make
> > them. I'll create an action item for tracking purposes because, in the face
> > of last call being over and no issues against wsc-usecases, we can finalize
> > this document. I will put it on a meeting agenda for us to resolve to
> > publish the note (or rather, technical report), when these updates have been
> > made:
> > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#q75
> > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#tr-end
> >
> >           Mez
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:"Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com >To:"Timothy
> > Hahn" < Timothy_Hahn%IBMUS@notesdev.ibm.com<Timothy_Hahn%25IBMUS@notesdev.ibm.com>
> > >Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> > Date:12/14/2007 11:30 AM Subject:usecases comments Re: Comments on draft
> > documents posted to the WSC wiki
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I find the following comments to be NOT editorial changes, requiring the
> > creation of an Issue if you want them tracked, discussed, and put into the
> > final version:
> >
> > Unintended Destination comment - please flesh it out to a full proposal.
> >
> >
> > Your comment format irritatingly truncates the right hand side of the
> > 6.5 table, so any comments in there (and the one directly after) cannot
> > be fully appreciated, or acted on.
> >
> > The "smartphone" insertion seems out of the blue.
> >
> > "composition from multiple items on the same host" does not seem like a
> > straightforward re wording of the text removed. I can't tell myself if it's
> > an accurate restatement.
> >
> > The data and jar uri comment seems misplaced, and I don't understand it.
> >
> >
> > "HTTP header information" comment has no references.
> >
> > Ditto for "DNS lookup results".
> >
> > In this context, "installed extensions" seems like an oxymoron, since
> > other items there have used "installed" to mean "pre installed with the
> > browser".
> >
> > Any comments with a "?" need a concrete proposal.
> >
> >
> > I find all OTHER comments to be editorial. The suggestion on a XSS
> > reference can be satisfied with a link to Wikipedia's article on it. On
> > those, I'm starting the "consensus" time clock. Silence for an extended
> > period of time will imply it, at which point that will signal the decision
> > to incorporate them.
> >
> >          Mez
> >
> >
> > From:Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUSTo: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>Date:11/28/2007 03:11 PM
> > Subject:Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have read the latest draft documents and placed comments via
> > attachments into the group's wiki.  See this page for links: *http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/DocsRepository
> > * <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/DocsRepository>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim Hahn
> > IBM Distinguished Engineer
> >
> > Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com
> > Internal: Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS
> > phone: 919.224.1565     tie-line: 8/687.1565
> > fax: 919.224.2530
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>