- From: Doyle, Bill <wdoyle@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:39:07 -0500
- To: "George Staikos" <staikos@kde.org>, "W3 Work Group" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
The breaking of "non-compliant sites" should also cause those providers to upgrade/fix the site. Would generate quite a few calls to the help desk. Bill D. -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of George Staikos Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 6:57 PM To: W3 Work Group Subject: Re: Action Item 18 - understand/visualize the strength of SSL On 8-Dec-06, at 5:58 AM, Doyle, Bill wrote: > > My feeling is that if the browser blocks the site and does not provide > feedback as to why and how to proceed, the user will find another > browser that works and will stop using the "broken" browser. If > feedback is not provided, the user learns nothing other than a > particular browser blocked the site. This is exactly why we need to 'break' all the major browsers simultaneously. Make the alternative hard, and the user will start to get the hint. -- George Staikos KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/ Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 13:40:06 UTC