- From: Doyle, Bill <wdoyle@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:33:10 -0500
- To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mikes@opera.com>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Good Point. Bill -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael(tm) Smith Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:02 AM To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Action Item 18 - understand/visualize the strength of SSL "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>, 2006-12-08 08:58 -0500: > In reading replies I can think of two situations where low grade cipher > suites can be negotiated and impact the user. > [...] > My feeling is that if the browser blocks the site and does not provide > feedback as to why and how to proceed, Exactly what feedback would you suggest for this case? > the user will find another browser that works and will stop > using the "broken" browser. If feedback is not provided, the > user learns nothing other than a particular browser blocked the > site. I'm inclined to think that most users will find another browser even if our browser provides feedback/details about why it's blocking the site. --Mike
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 13:33:43 UTC