- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:09:56 -0500
- To: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 30 January 2011 00:10:35 UTC
Things are a little out of sync right now. I think we're using: http://www.w3.org/2011/01/scenario as the namespace. But the docs are still at: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies So, http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/scenario.html is the scenario doc and http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/scenario/ contains the metadata - including the current evd file. Perhaps we should use "2002/ws/ra/edcopies" as the namespace so we don't have this weird inconsistency. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 01/29/2011 06:43 PM To "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> cc Subject Re: better/updated EVD and Notification WSDL Wait, what namespace URI are we using for these tests? The target namespace in these metadata might need updating . . . ~ gp On 1/29/2011 3:29 PM, Gilbert Pilz wrote: Upon reviewing the test scenario, I realized I forgot to define the "NewAnimal", "UpdateAnimal", and "RemoveAnimal" event types. Attached is an updated EVD and auto-generated Notification WSDL. ~ gp
Received on Sunday, 30 January 2011 00:10:35 UTC