Re: slightly more complicated WS-MEX question

ah, didn't notice the old namespace.  But even with that version Type is a 
required attribute on the Dialect element so I don't know what the 2nd 
example is trying to say.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com> 
01/18/2011 12:02 PM

To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Subject
Re: slightly more complicated WS-MEX question






OK, that's not what it says in: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ws-metadata-exchange-20100805/#GetMetadata

That version of the spec (2nd LC) has @Content as an attribute of 
mex:Dialect not mex:GetMetadata.

~ gp

On 1/18/2011 8:43 AM, Doug Davis wrote: 

No, the 2nd one isn't legal, but if you meant to write: 

<mex:GetMetadata Content="http://www.w3.org/2010/08/ws-mex/Content/URI">
  <mex:Dialect Type="wsdl:definitions"/>
</mex:GetMetadata> 

then yes. 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. 


Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 
01/18/2011 11:34 AM 


To
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> 
cc

Subject
slightly more complicated WS-MEX question








I think I know the answer to this, but thought I would verify this: are 
the following two GetMetadata requests semantically equivalent?

<mex:GetMetadata>
  <mex:Dialect Type="wsdl:definitions" Content=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/08/ws-mex/Content/URI"/>
</mex:GetMetadata>

<mex:GetMetadata>
  <mex:Dialect Type="wsdl:definitions"/>
  <mex:Dialect Content="http://www.w3.org/2010/08/ws-mex/Content/URI"/>
</mex:GetMetadata>

~ gp