- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:43:13 -0500
- To: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 16:49:12 UTC
No, the 2nd one isn't legal, but if you meant to write: <mex:GetMetadata Content="http://www.w3.org/2010/08/ws-mex/Content/URI"> <mex:Dialect Type="wsdl:definitions"/> </mex:GetMetadata> then yes. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 01/18/2011 11:34 AM To "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> cc Subject slightly more complicated WS-MEX question I think I know the answer to this, but thought I would verify this: are the following two GetMetadata requests semantically equivalent? <mex:GetMetadata> <mex:Dialect Type="wsdl:definitions" Content= "http://www.w3.org/2010/08/ws-mex/Content/URI"/> </mex:GetMetadata> <mex:GetMetadata> <mex:Dialect Type="wsdl:definitions"/> <mex:Dialect Content="http://www.w3.org/2010/08/ws-mex/Content/URI"/> </mex:GetMetadata> ~ gp
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 16:49:12 UTC