- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:42 -0500
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF6649B58F.6F49B24A-ON852576B1.004710E4-852576B1.00476508@us.ibm.com>
Yves and I chatted a bit and here's the proposal we came up with to solve
7774 [1]:
1) changed transfer's put from:
This specification defines one Web service operation (Put) for
updating a resource by providing a replacement representation.
to:
This specification defines one Web service operation (Put) for
updating a resource.
2) change transfer's put from:
A Put request MUST be targeted at the resource whose representation is
desired to be replaced,
to:
A Put request MUST be targeted at the resource whose representation is
desired to be replaced or updated,
3) follow Create's lead by adding this to the end of the [Body]/wst:Put
description:
The first child element, if present, MUST be the literal resource
representation or other instructions for updating the resource.
The basic idea is to make it clear, in transfer, that Put supports the
notion of an instruction and not just a complete representation
replacement.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7774
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 13:00:29 UTC