- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:42 -0500
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF6649B58F.6F49B24A-ON852576B1.004710E4-852576B1.00476508@us.ibm.com>
Yves and I chatted a bit and here's the proposal we came up with to solve 7774 [1]: 1) changed transfer's put from: This specification defines one Web service operation (Put) for updating a resource by providing a replacement representation. to: This specification defines one Web service operation (Put) for updating a resource. 2) change transfer's put from: A Put request MUST be targeted at the resource whose representation is desired to be replaced, to: A Put request MUST be targeted at the resource whose representation is desired to be replaced or updated, 3) follow Create's lead by adding this to the end of the [Body]/wst:Put description: The first child element, if present, MUST be the literal resource representation or other instructions for updating the resource. The basic idea is to make it clear, in transfer, that Put supports the notion of an instruction and not just a complete representation replacement. [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7774 thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 13:00:29 UTC