RE: snapshot review

Doug,
Thanks for pointing out that Microsoft actually proposed this wording :)
Can someone spell embarrassing?

Somehow the words seem to have been accidentally flipped on our side.
Perhaps it is best to create a new issue about this.

All the best,
Geoff

From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:23 AM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: RE: snapshot review


I believe this is the issue that caused it:  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6725

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

Geoff Bullen <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org

05/26/2009 01:12 PM

To

Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>

cc

Subject

RE: snapshot review







Just adding one extra editorial issue / question :

Eventing Spec: Section 3.4 - Terminology

Old Version says:
Subscription Manager
A Web service that accepts requests to manage get the status of, renew, and/or delete subscriptions on behalf of an event source.

New version says:
Subscription Manager
A Web service that accepts requests to create, get the status of, renew, and/or delete subscriptions on behalf of an event source.
I do not understand which WG issue changed "manage" into "create" - but create does not seem accurate in describing the functionality of a Subscription Manager, in that a subscribe message (a "create") is sent to the event source and the subscription manager is returned as part of the subscribe response.

I am sure we can discuss this today and resolve very quickly.
--Geoff


From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gilbert Pilz
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:10 PM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: snapshot review

On reviewing the snapshots I found the following editorial nits:

WS-T, Section 2.5: The sentence beginning "Specifically, a compliant SOAP Node"; the 'Specifically' seems to be a hold-over from this sentence's previous location. Suggest removing this word.

WS-RT, Section 3.3: s/Web Services Transfer namespace URI/Web Services Resource Transfer namespace URI/

WS-Eventing, Section 3.3: s/Web Services Transfer namespace URI/Web Services Eventing namespace URI/

- gp