- From: Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:43:03 -0400
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-Id: <FDF27172-5127-4D9C-B7BC-B2CAC4D83697@hitachisoftware.com>
The following is a draft that incorporates the current state of agreement on Issue-6692. Note that within the document there are several areas marked "TBD" which represent further aspects that are yet to be thrashed out. This version has been reviewed by both Microsoft and IBM and both are agreeable as to it use as the reference for further issue negotiation. The summary of further work needed is : 1) Fault behavior relating to delivery extensions as the original fault definition related to @mode 2) extension negotiation behavior if any since the original @mode fault optional detail element was thought to provide some negotiation mechanism albeit unreliable 3) Use of the word "Push" rather than simply the one default method of notification delivery. Nothing particularly distinguishes "Push" from normal asynchronous delivery and its use in th text is infrequent I would be interested in discussing this on the next call as well as the opinion of folks as to the potential division of this issue into three additional issues as represented by the points above. thanks -bob
Attachments
- application/msword attachment: wseventing-6692-9-1.doc
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 17:43:51 UTC