Re: Proposal for Issue 6700

Hi Doug:
The word "straightforward"  is there to say  "hey, this is simple, and 
so we will not spell it out in detail".
So, I think it's useful.
All the best, Ashok


Doug Davis wrote:
>
> I like this approach.  Just 2 minor things...
> 1 - remove the word "straightword" - while it is, we don't need to say 
> it  :-)  So the sentence would just be:
>       A mapping from XML to Infoset is as described below, ...
> 2 - I'm assuming this would kill off the previous resolved issue for 
> Subscribe infoset, right?
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
> The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
>
>
> *"Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com>*
> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
>
> 08/25/2009 10:46 AM
>
> 	
> To
> 	<public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
> cc
> 	<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
> Subject
> 	Proposal for Issue 6700
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This proposal is based on the consensus between Ashok, Wu and Gil. To
> complete the Infoset description for WS-Eventing, we propose to just add
> the following text at the end of "Section 3.1 Notational Conventions" of
> WS-Eventing, instead of following the approach taken by 6424:
>
> ---
> This specification is defined in terms of XML Information Set (Infoset)
> and not in terms of XML 1.0, even though the specification uses XML 1.0
> terminology. A mapping from XML to Infoset is straightforward as
> described below, and it is recommended that this should be used for any
> non-XML serializations.
>
> XML documents map to Infoset Document Information Items.  XML Elements
> map to Infoset Element Information Items (EIIs) and attributes map to
> Infoset Attribute Information Items (AIIs).  The *children* property of
> an Element Information Item (EII) is a collection of EIIs corresponding
> to its Element Children.  The *attributes* property of an EII is a
> collection of AIIs corresponding to its attributes.
>
> See the Infoset specification [http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/] for
> more details.
> ---
>
> We hope this proposal can be applied to related issues 6701-6704 as
> well, by adding the above text to the "Notational Conventions" section
> of each corresponding spec.
>
> Li Li
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 15:25:56 UTC