- From: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:30:33 +0000
- To: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 17:31:20 UTC
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7235 My comments: The use of namespaces such as XPath 1.0 by WS-RA specifications seems consistent with use of other such standard namespaces such as SOAP, WSDL, and so on; meaning, the WS-RA specifications do not add to or modify the elements in the imported namespaces. Further, the imported namespaces are published standards and they are stable in time; any change that occurs to the namespace contents (elements defined in the namespace) should result in a revision to the namespace URI as governed by the namespace change policy. Hence, it is safe to refer to published standard namespace URIs. Consequently, I do not see a good reason to introduce a surrogate namespace URI for an existing standard namespace URI. Thanks.
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 17:31:20 UTC