- From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:41:32 -0500
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Felix, > Prasad, as you send the link, could you please include the questions >below (including Fredericks note on IRC) into that mail? Sure, I will include them. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:16 PM To: Asir Vedamuthu Cc: Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: Re: Interop Scenarios and Test Cases Asir Vedamuthu wrote: > ACTION-164 [Scenarios] Prepare PDF document with licensing text from Felix and list of editors - Asir Vedamuthu > ACTION-166 [Scenarios] send the licensing text to Asir - Felix Sasaki > ACTION-167 [Scenarios] check in the PDF document + test cases (using a new initial directory 'interop' - Asir Vedamuthu > > > COMPLETED - Interop scenarios and test cases are at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/ws/policy/interop/. > > If there aren't any issues, Prasad will send a link to the interop scenarios and test cases to the WG tomorrow after 5 PM Pacific. Prasad, as you send the link, could you please include the questions below (including Fredericks note on IRC) into that mail? Thanks, Felix <Frederick> To repeat what I think Felix said, is there an alternative document template for test cases, e.g. like WSDL groups' Should the WG use a framework for test case dev? Who would prepare such a framework? Who would maintain the framework? Who would contribute test cases that conform to the framework? What is the schedule for such a test case framework? Felix: WG should be aware of this and make a conscious decision > > PS: apologize for the CVS spam. > > Regards, > > Asir S Vedamuthu > Microsoft Corporation > >
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:41:59 UTC