Re: [Guidelines] Proposed update to section 4.5 (now 5.5), Design ating Optional Behaviors

no problem, open discussion on this is fine. I'll respond on the WG  
thread.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia


On Apr 17, 2007, at 5:50 PM, ext Prasad Yendluri wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> My apologies, I did not intend to send my reply to the whole WG.
>
> Somehow I thought we were discussing this within just the editorial  
> team.
>
> Did not realize Frederick’s note was sent to the WG list.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Prasad
>
>
>
> From: Prasad Yendluri
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:07 PM
> To: 'Frederick Hirsch'; public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [Guidelines] Proposed update to section 4.5 (now 5.5),  
> Designating Optional Behaviors
>
>
>
> Hi Frederick,
>
>
>
> Couple of quick comments.
>
>
>
> 1. Good practice (b) and (d) seem to have the same good practice  
> description.
>
> That is lines 28-29 and 62-63 are identical (ref: .pdf w/o diff).
>
>
>
> 2. Some of these best practices could be applicable on a broader  
> scope rather than just
>
> "optional assertions". For example, the following best practice w/o  
> optional could be
>
> applicable to WSDL attachment (described in the section that  
> follows this one).
>
>
>
> “Assertion Authors should associate optional assertions with the  
> appropriate endpoint,
>
> and right granularity to limit the degree to which optionality  
> applies.”
>
>
>
> Is it worth rephrasing these to be more generic so that they can  
> also be applicable
>
> elsewhere rather than scoping them strictly to optional assertions?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Prasad
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy- 
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Hirsch
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 8:20 AM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Cc: Frederick Hirsch
> Subject: [Guidelines] Proposed update to section 4.5 (now 5.5),  
> Designating Optional Behaviors
>
>
>
> I took an editors action item to revise section 4.5 of the Guidelines
>
> (designating optional behaviors) to reflect the approach taken in the
>
> Web architecture document, to re-structure as problem statement, best
>
> practices and then example. [1]
>
>
>
> This resulted in a fairly extensive edit so I am sharing the revision
>
> with the WG before completing the edits. I added some best practices
>
> based on the original text.
>
>
>
> Attached are plain and red-lines, with revised section numbers due to
>
> a subsequent change to the documents to add summary section of best
>
> practices at the beginning of the document. (Will probably need to
>
> add informative reference to MTOM assertion)
>
>
>
> regards, Frederick
>
>
>
> Frederick Hirsch
>
> Nokia
>
>
>
> [1] <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-
>
> guidelines.html?rev=1.38&content-type=text/html;%
>
> 20charset=iso-8859-1#optional-policy-assertion>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:41:09 UTC