RE: My Ais for Sec 6.2/6.3 for 3989

Looks good!

I suggest one minor change to make it super clear on who should do what:

s/Use independent assertions for modeling multiple equivalent behaviors./An assertion author should use independent assertions for modeling multiple versions of a behavior./

>4. I couldn't think of an example where we could
>point to a spec that changed it's policy subjects
>over time.

I am not aware of any.

Regards,

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 12:31 PM
To: public-ws-policy-eds
Subject: My Ais for Sec 6.2/6.3 for 3989


I've checked in my proposals for 3989.  Let me know what y'all think of
it.  Some things of note:

1. There didn't seem to be too much work to do this.  Hence, I can take
on another AI if somebody would like.

2. There was an extra Best Practice about identify policy subjects that
seemed to be a dup of the very first bp.  So I deleted it.

3. One of the cool results of our movement to identified BP is that I
rewrote the sentence that just refered to section #2 and said policy
subjects should be identified to actually point to the Best Practice.

4. I couldn't think of an example where we could point to a spec that
changed it's policy subjects over time.  Can anybody help?

Cheers,
Dave

Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:02:36 UTC