Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
David Booth
Jonathan Marsh
- RE: Editorial last call review comments (Tuesday, 28 June)
- RE: [LC9] Last Call issue: How does the Operation Name Mapping Requirement (Part 1, section 2.2.1.1) relate to interface inheritance? (Tuesday, 28 June)
- RE: Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension" (Thursday, 16 June)
- RE: LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification (Thursday, 16 June)
- RE: What is the SOAP MEP for In-only (Thursday, 9 June)
- LC84a/b resolutions (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: default interface/operation/@pattern (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: Comments (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: {soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: NEW ISSUE - message level binding? (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"] (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: binding fault defaulting? (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: WSDL 2.0 2005-05-10 Working Draft Discrepancies (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (Thursday, 9 June)
- RE: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (Thursday, 9 June)
Martin Gudgin
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Rich Salz
Roland Merrick
Last message date: Tuesday, 28 June 2005 21:11:09 UTC