- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:46:26 -0700
- To: "David Booth" <dbooth@hp.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
The WG accepted the editor's resolution of this issue (LC122 [1]). You can see the results at [2]. We'll assume you accept this resolution if we don't hear from you within two weeks. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC122 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts. html > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 7:23 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension" > > > Part 2 sometimes uses the term "binding" when it should say "binding > extension". A "binding" is a wsdl: construct that employs a > particular > "binding extension", such as the WSDL 2.0 SOAP Binding Extension. > > Also, typo: > Part 2 Sec 5: s/associated the message/associated with the message/ > > > -- > > David Booth >
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 18:46:53 UTC