RE: [lc34] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive)
[lc35] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive)
[lc26] Clarify which fault if SOAP Action and wsa:Action don't match (SOAP, substantive)
[lc6][lc35]: Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive)
Overriding WSDL 2.0 fault ruleset behavior
WSDL "service references" and WSA endpoint references
Language for Reference Parameters
Minutes of the 2004-04-[19,20] F2F
i056 Proposal
NEW ISSUE: Semantics of wsa:UsingAddressing@wsdl:Required="false" case are unclear.
Closed LC Issues from F2F
Possibly substantive LC issues
Fw: proposal to add an {action} property to message and fault reference components
Missing xml namespace prefix declaration (WSDL, editorial)
i058 resolution text
i021 resolution
LC9 - Reinforce absolute IRIs
LC10 - EIIs have QNames
Action item for issue i021
i055: Sample RDDL document
Last Call issues list
NEW ISSUE: Splitting semantics of namespace across multiple WS-A specs inhibits independent versioning
NEW ISSUE: Defining MAPs in WSDL service descriptions
NEW ISSUE: Support for asynchronous / multi-MEP usage of web services
NEW ISSUE: Defining MAPs in WSDL service descriptions [i058]
Editorial stuff for Core Spec
Minutes of the 2005-04-11 teleconference
Syncing XSD and Spec
Typo?
NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [reference parameters] property from WSDL?
NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [destination] property from WSDL?
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-11
NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI?
- RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI?
- Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI?
- Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI?
- RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI?
- RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI?
- Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? [i055]