- From: Srinivas, Davanum M <Davanum.Srinivas@ca.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:39:48 -0400
- To: <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Guess it's a layering question. We refer to wsaw in the following places: - Table 1-1 which lists the namespaces - Text in 1.2 which says ("WS-Addressing may be used with WSDL [WSDL 2.0] described services as described in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - WSDL Binding") - Example 3-1 <wsa:Metadata> <wsaw:InterfaceName>fabrikam:Inventory</wsaw:InterfaceName> <wsa:Metadata> - Section 7 - Reference I guess my question is, do we really need to refer to wsaw in the "SOAP Binding" document? JUST because we use it in the example? (or am I missing something obvious) Thanks, dims -----Original Message----- From: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 5:48 PM To: Srinivas, Davanum M Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject: Re: Typo? On Apr 11, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Srinivas, Davanum M wrote: > > Was reviewing the Editors draft and ran into example 3-1 in SOAP > Binding...Should we get rid of > "<wsaw:InterfaceName>fabrikam:Inventory</wsaw:InterfaceName>" from > that example? > Why do you want to get rid of it ? Marc. --- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 22:39:51 UTC