public-ws-addressing@w3.org from April 2005 by author

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: i058 resolution text (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? (Monday, 11 April)
• NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [reference parameters] property from WSDL? (Monday, 11 April)
• NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [destination] property from WSDL? (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Issue i020, subissue 3 proposal (Monday, 4 April)

David Hull

• NEW ISSUE: Semantics of wsa:UsingAddressing@wsdl:Required="false" case are unclear. (Friday, 22 April)
• Possibly substantive LC issues (Friday, 22 April)

Francisco Curbera

• Re: Language for Reference Parameters (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Action item for issue i021 (Tuesday, 19 April)

Glen Daniels

• NEW ISSUE: Support for asynchronous / multi-MEP usage of web services (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 4 April)

Greg Truty

• LC9 - Reinforce absolute IRIs (Tuesday, 19 April)

Hugo Haas

• Re: Test Case Form Try-out (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: New Issue (editorial): problem with namespace documents (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 4 April)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: [lc34] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive) (Friday, 29 April)
• [lc35] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive) (Friday, 29 April)
• [lc26] Clarify which fault if SOAP Action and wsa:Action don't match (SOAP, substantive) (Friday, 29 April)
• [lc6][lc35]: Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive) (Friday, 29 April)
• Overriding WSDL 2.0 fault ruleset behavior (Thursday, 28 April)
• WSDL "service references" and WSA endpoint references (Thursday, 28 April)
• i058 resolution text (Wednesday, 20 April)
• i055: Sample RDDL document (Monday, 18 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? (Monday, 11 April)
• RE: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 11 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? (Monday, 11 April)
• NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? (Thursday, 7 April)
• New Issue (editorial): problem with namespace documents (Monday, 4 April)

Marc Hadley

• i056 Proposal (Friday, 22 April)
• Closed LC Issues from F2F (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Typo? (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: Syncing XSD and Spec (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Typo? (Monday, 11 April)

Mark Nottingham

• Minutes of the 2004-04-[19,20] F2F (Saturday, 23 April)
• i021 resolution (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Last Call issues list (Friday, 15 April)
• Agenda: 2005-04-19 F2F, Sunnyvale, CA, US (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Support for asynchronous / multi-MEP usage of web services (Friday, 15 April)
• NEW ISSUE: Defining MAPs in WSDL service descriptions [i058] (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [reference parameters] property from WSDL? [i057] (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [destination] property from WSDL? [i056] (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? [i055] (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Editorial stuff for Core Spec (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Minutes of the 2005-04-11 teleconference (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-11 (Monday, 11 April)
• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-11 (Monday, 11 April)
• Agenda: 2005-04-19 F2F, Sunnyvale, CA, US [DRAFT] (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Minutes of the 2005-04-04 teleconference (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-04 [NOTE CHANGED TIMES] (Saturday, 2 April)
• Satisfying WSDL-related charter requirements (Friday, 1 April)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-11 (Monday, 11 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? (Friday, 8 April)

Prasad Yendluri

• Re: NEW ISSUE: Defining MAPs in WSDL service descriptions (Friday, 15 April)
• NEW ISSUE: Splitting semantics of namespace across multiple WS-A specs inhibits independent versioning (Friday, 15 April)
• NEW ISSUE: Defining MAPs in WSDL service descriptions (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Action item for issue i021 (Monday, 4 April)

Rogers, Tony

• RE: [lc35] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive) (Friday, 29 April)
• LC10 - EIIs have QNames (Tuesday, 19 April)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Fw: proposal to add an {action} property to message and fault reference components (Thursday, 21 April)

Savas Parastatidis

• RE: Language for Reference Parameters (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Language for Reference Parameters (Tuesday, 26 April)

Srinivas, Davanum M

• Editorial stuff for Core Spec (Tuesday, 12 April)
• RE: Typo? (Monday, 11 April)
• RE: Typo? (Monday, 11 April)
• Syncing XSD and Spec (Monday, 11 April)
• Typo? (Monday, 11 April)

Winkler, Steve

• Missing xml namespace prefix declaration (WSDL, editorial) (Wednesday, 20 April)

Last message date: Friday, 29 April 2005 21:55:15 UTC