- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:05:24 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, yingying@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9VW-imZYr7ksah=iW=o_ALcRwNvixV-07y2B_zzef5sdA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Group, It's 2 weeks since we started the doodle poll to identify the preferred date for the oneM2M joint call. The preferred date/time is "Wed, 31 Aug. 8am EDT" (=usual IG call time) according to the results at: http://doodle.com/poll/k4dmin4f45q6knvi :) Yingying, could you please get back to Yongjing and let him know about this? Thanks, Kazuyuki On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org> wrote: > Hi group, > > Based on the discussion during the previous call on July 27th, > I've created a Doodle poll to choose the date&time for the expected > joint call with Yongjing Zhang from oneM2M. > > Please visit: > http://doodle.com/poll/k4dmin4f45q6knvi > and let us know your preferred date&time. > > Thanks, > > Kazuyuki > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org> > wrote: > >> available at: >> https://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html >> >> also as text below. >> >> Thanks a lot for taking notes, Daniel! >> >> Kazuyuki >> >> --- >> [1]W3C >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/ >> >> - DRAFT - >> >> WoT IG >> >> 27 Jul 2016 >> >> [2]Agenda >> >> [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_WebConf#Agenda_of_ >> next_WoT_IG_WebConf:_27_July_2016 >> >> See also: [3]IRC log >> >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-irc >> >> Attendees >> >> Present >> Kaz, Dave, Michael, Bowen, Daniel, Masato, Matthias, >> Johannes, Sebastian, Taki, Nan, Ryuichi, Katsuyoshi, >> Wonsuk, Yingying >> >> Regrets >> Chair >> Matthias >> >> Scribe >> dape >> >> Contents >> >> * [4]Topics >> 1. [5]Quick Updates >> 2. [6]WG Charter >> 3. [7]Beijing Recap >> 4. [8]PlugFest Test Case Reports >> 5. [9]IG Deliverables >> 6. [10]TPAC@Lisbon >> 7. [11]group discussion: ask participants to share >> information/slides which are presented @ conferences, >> etc >> 8. [12]AOB >> 9. [13]Next WebConf call >> * [14]Summary of Action Items >> * [15]Summary of Resolutions >> __________________________________________________________ >> >> <scribe> scribe: dape >> >> <scribe> scribeNick: DP >> >> <kaz> scribenick: dape >> >> Quick Updates >> >> MK: asked Scott Jenson to join >> ... he can join already next week (last half an hour) >> >> DR: restarting the group was approved by W3C >> >> MK: Any changes we have to think of? >> >> DR: no changes >> >> WG Charter >> >> <kaz> [16]WG charter >> >> [16] http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-2016.html >> >> MK: beginning of week I incorporated remaining issues >> ... no open issues on github >> ... should we ask for the resolution now? >> >> DR: Can share some procedure points >> >> <mkovatsc> >> [17]http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-2016.html >> >> [17] http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-2016.html >> >> DR: W3C management might require some changes (eg. relation to >> other groups) >> >> <mkovatsc> "wide range of scales from microcontrollers to >> cloud-based server farms" >> >> DR: will let you know if this happens >> >> MK: Last week Frank discussed microcontroller requirements >> ... charter states this already >> ... do we need more discussion on this? >> >> DR: Not sure about Franks proposal >> >> MK: Frank reported that we should put more focus on >> microcontroller requirements >> >> <kaz> [ the current draft charter says "Servers can be provided >> at a wide range of scales from microcontrollers to cloud-based >> server farms." ] >> >> MK: I think we have already a statement there which should be >> sufficient >> >> DR: I agree with sticking to what we have >> >> Kaz: Yes, it is already mentioned in the charter >> >> MK: the technical level should not be covered in the charter >> >> JH: writing minimum footprint in charter is not sensible. >> Charter is more about goal setting... supporting also >> microcontrollers >> ... would see this is covered in current charter >> >> SK: Frank presented slides about microcontroller market (8 bit >> microcontroller et cetera) >> ... he was concerned that we don't address this properly >> ... I think W3C standardization does not propose a technical >> solutions >> ... there will be optimized libraries for microcontrollers >> >> MK: Frank is not here.... do not hear concern... looks like >> people are happy with charter as is... >> ... microcontrollers are definitely in scope >> ... Do you agree that charter is ready for AC review? >> >> All: no objections >> >> RESOLUTION: IG believes current WG charter is ready for AC >> review >> >> Beijing Recap >> >> <kaz> [18]Beijing minutes >> >> [18] https://www.w3.org/2016/07/13-14-wot-minutes.html >> >> MK: Last time issues with action items >> >> Kaz: Should be fixed now >> ... please look at minutes which can be found at >> [19]https://www.w3.org/2016/07/13-14-wot-minutes.html >> ... right in the beginning you will find action itmes >> >> [19] https://www.w3.org/2016/07/13-14-wot-minutes.html >> >> Kaz goes over action items >> >> <yingying_> >> [20]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wot-ig/2016Jul/ >> 0006.html >> >> [20] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wot-ig/2016Jul/ >> 0006.html >> >> YY: we would like to have a joint oneM2M meeting >> ... we need to agree on date >> ... the proposed dates are: Aug 31 or Sep 7. >> ... suggest to have dedicated meeting >> >> MK: Extra slot before or after normal call? >> >> YY: We can decide... just the days were proposed >> >> MK: for me Aug 31 would work >> >> JH: Could setup a poll (doodle) ? >> >> Kaz: yes, can use doodle >> ... can setup doodle, before and after slot >> ... talked to SCXML editor >> ... can join our call (about 10 minutes talk) >> ... next week? >> >> MK: in the beginning would be ok? >> >> SK: action of (Dave and Sebastian) to investigate on the >> Optimized JSON Schema no progress yet >> >> MK: can plugin updates to proposal folder on github >> >> SK: can share some updates within 2-3 weeks >> >> DP: Did send email about " to check directly with the >> implementers and see who have participated in the PlugFests so >> far" >> ... got feedback: online plugfest would be good! >> >> MK: propose to extend template by Taki to know what people >> would have available... >> >> <mkovatsc> >> [21]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFests_-_Template_for_Plu >> gFest_description >> >> [21] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFests_-_Template_for_ >> PlugFest_description >> >> Kaz: action by Taki "to generate a template of PlugFest >> description" is done? >> >> MK: Yes... first draft >> >> TK: there are 2 descriptions >> ... first we need collection unit description >> ... as part of this (picture, hardware, platform, WoT >> functions, ..) >> ... every participant describes the "Unit Description" part >> ... second we have scenario description >> ... think we had 3 scenarios... by linking to unit description >> ... that is a first proposal for the template >> >> MK: Thanks! >> ... propose to de-couple unit from scenario description >> >> TK: Agree >> >> MK: Do you as participant miss anything? can you fill this out? >> >> SK: looks good to me >> >> JH: Yes, ok >> >> MK: picture could be also logo >> ... change "Description of what the scripts does" to >> application logic ... without scripting >> >> TK: good point... >> >> MK: I am editing the page >> >> DP: split Unit and Scenario description... two pages? >> >> <kaz> ACTION: sebastian to take care of the scenario >> description [recorded in >> [22]http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html#action01] >> >> [22] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html#action01] >> >> <trackbot> 'sebastian' is an ambiguous username. Please try a >> different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., >> sha, skbisch). >> >> MK: propose individuals provide unit description... and one >> builds the scenario description >> >> SK: can take care of Scenario description >> >> Kaz: format or style... do we use wiki? >> >> MK: seemed convenient... might work in future on a better >> visualization >> ... should start working on PlugFest templates soon.. >> >> PlugFest Test Case Reports >> >> <mkovatsc> >> [23]https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/plugfest/2016-beijin >> g/TestCaseCoverage.xlsx?raw=true >> >> [23] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/plugfest/2016- >> beijing/TestCaseCoverage.xlsx?raw=true >> >> MK: please fill out PlugFest Test Case Reports soon >> ... send to mailing list or directly to me >> ... any remaining issues from Beijing? >> >> DR: We should work on blog post >> >> MK: DP started working on it >> >> DR: timeline? >> >> MK: planned for end of week >> ... Dave, would you be interested in supporting >> >> DR: Yes, but will be busy next days >> >> MK: Test wordpress draft or as fallback Google doc >> >> IG Deliverables >> >> <kaz> [24]roadmap >> >> [24] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Roadmap >> >> MK: planned releases >> ... please have a look again.. >> ... raise concerns/issues >> >> <kaz> [25]use cases and requirements >> >> [25] http://w3c.github.io/wot/wot-ucr.html >> >> MK: assigned editors... use-cases and requirements (Johannes) >> >> JH: last addition was month ago.. >> ... don't think there are any additions >> ... any contributor? >> ... propose publishing >> >> MK: Kaz can you check with Johannes about style and such >> >> Kaz: yes >> >> MK: new use-cases will lead updated versions... no final >> document >> >> <kaz> [26]tech landscape >> >> [26] https://w3c.github.io/wot/landscape.html >> >> MK: next document is tech-landscape from Soumya >> ... Soumya was hard to grasp recently >> ... anyone talked to him? >> >> (none) >> >> MK: Someone volunteering to finish up the document? >> >> Kaz: will contact Soumya first >> >> MK: Yes, will also reach out on mailing list for another >> editor... >> >> <kaz> [27]architecture >> >> [27] http://w3c.github.io/wot/architecture/wot-architecture.html >> >> MK: architecture document is very active.. which is very good >> ... have one comment.. will send in PR >> >> <kaz> [28]current practices >> >> [28] http://w3c.github.io/wot/current-practices/wot-practices.html >> >> MK: current practices can be frozen.. >> >> <mkovatsc> trying to fix audio >> >> MK: Beijing release is frozen.. >> ... it is a living document tough >> >> Kaz: can publish IG notes every 3 months >> >> MK: Okay.. will publish Beijing version and start working on >> Lisbon >> >> Kaz: once draft documents are fixed, we will talk about >> publication again, right? >> >> MK: will try to fix the document by next week >> >> JH: should be able to do the same >> >> TPAC@Lisbon >> >> MK: Will be a Demo room available on Wednesday? >> >> Kaz: talked to planning team >> ... wondering about size of room >> ... bigger rooms are already booked >> >> MK: Mhh, nots ure >> >> Kaz: mid-size room in Beijing? >> >> MK: even smaller is OK.. >> >> Kaz: 20 people room? >> >> MK: sounds good to me >> >> Kaz: difficult to get dedicated room for demo preparation for >> whole week >> >> MK: Early the day or the day before might be also ok >> >> Kaz: let's have more internal discussions before contacting >> TPAC team again >> >> MK: PlugFest: task overview of the participants? >> >> DP: think it was about "how" to introduce the demo >> >> MK: When do participants plan to work on Plugfest? >> >> Naka: started to work on explanation >> >> DP: should we have a test-run before TPAC? >> >> MK: Yes, if possible >> >> group discussion: ask participants to share information/slides which >> are presented @ conferences, etc >> >> MK: I added "getting started" on github >> ... can create "infomaterial" folder? >> ... who else has material? >> >> DR: I have some and linked them from our page >> >> DP: move everything to this folder? >> >> DR: Page with links fine also >> >> MK: Having a pool for figures... editable PPTs et cetera would >> be good instead of fixed PDFs >> >> Kaz: shall we create wiki page for this purpose >> >> MK: versioning might be good >> ... will create "material" folder on github >> ... everyone is asked to support and share >> >> AOB >> >> <Zakim> kaz, you wanted to remind all of the TPAC registration >> :) >> >> <kaz> [29]TPAC registration site >> >> [29] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2016/?login >> >> Kaz: I would like remind you to register for TPAC >> >> DR: Can you send email? >> >> Kaz: will do >> >> <yingying_> [30]flyer creation timeline >> >> [30] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wot-comms/ >> 2016Jul/0004.html >> >> YY: one point about flyers >> ... very limited time >> >> MK: Can you send draft top mailinglist >> >> YY: Dave wanted to review it first? >> >> DR: Suggest share pointer now, >> >> [31]https://www.w3.org/Member/wiki/WoT/Flyers >> >> [31] https://www.w3.org/Member/wiki/WoT/Flyers >> >> YY: will send email also >> >> MK: no real flyer yet >> >> YY: Yes, just content for now >> ... Karen's feedback and layout next >> ... printing and shipping is costly >> >> DP: printing in Europe might be another choice >> >> MK: Was there a deadline? >> >> YY: yes, 2 weeks >> >> Next WebConf call >> >> MK: state chart xml intro >> ... Scott Jenson >> >> DP: resolution of publishing documents could be another topic >> >> MK: Yes >> >> Summary of Action Items >> >> [NEW] ACTION: sebastian to take care of the scenario >> description [recorded in >> [32]http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html#action01] >> >> [32] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html#action01 >> >> Summary of Resolutions >> >> 1. [33]IG believes current WG charter is ready for AC review >> >> [End of minutes] >> __________________________________________________________ >> >> >> Minutes formatted by David Booth's [34]scribe.perl version >> 1.144 ([35]CVS log) >> $Date: 2016/07/27 13:40:50 $ >> >> [34] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm >> [35] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ >> >> > > > -- > Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, WoT, TV, MMI and Geo > Tel: +81 3 3516 2504 > > -- Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, WoT, TV, MMI and Geo Tel: +81 3 3516 2504
Received on Monday, 15 August 2016 03:06:38 UTC