- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:25:22 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9XNmN1TWOyqOr54tU=SQNPVaOCOhD9yXM4ic4irLnsHOw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi group, Based on the discussion during the previous call on July 27th, I've created a Doodle poll to choose the date&time for the expected joint call with Yongjing Zhang from oneM2M. Please visit: http://doodle.com/poll/k4dmin4f45q6knvi and let us know your preferred date&time. Thanks, Kazuyuki On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org> wrote: > available at: > https://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html > > also as text below. > > Thanks a lot for taking notes, Daniel! > > Kazuyuki > > --- > [1]W3C > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ > > - DRAFT - > > WoT IG > > 27 Jul 2016 > > [2]Agenda > > [2] > https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_WebConf#Agenda_of_next_WoT_IG_WebConf:_27_July_2016 > > See also: [3]IRC log > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-irc > > Attendees > > Present > Kaz, Dave, Michael, Bowen, Daniel, Masato, Matthias, > Johannes, Sebastian, Taki, Nan, Ryuichi, Katsuyoshi, > Wonsuk, Yingying > > Regrets > Chair > Matthias > > Scribe > dape > > Contents > > * [4]Topics > 1. [5]Quick Updates > 2. [6]WG Charter > 3. [7]Beijing Recap > 4. [8]PlugFest Test Case Reports > 5. [9]IG Deliverables > 6. [10]TPAC@Lisbon > 7. [11]group discussion: ask participants to share > information/slides which are presented @ conferences, > etc > 8. [12]AOB > 9. [13]Next WebConf call > * [14]Summary of Action Items > * [15]Summary of Resolutions > __________________________________________________________ > > <scribe> scribe: dape > > <scribe> scribeNick: DP > > <kaz> scribenick: dape > > Quick Updates > > MK: asked Scott Jenson to join > ... he can join already next week (last half an hour) > > DR: restarting the group was approved by W3C > > MK: Any changes we have to think of? > > DR: no changes > > WG Charter > > <kaz> [16]WG charter > > [16] http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-2016.html > > MK: beginning of week I incorporated remaining issues > ... no open issues on github > ... should we ask for the resolution now? > > DR: Can share some procedure points > > <mkovatsc> > [17]http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-2016.html > > [17] http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-2016.html > > DR: W3C management might require some changes (eg. relation to > other groups) > > <mkovatsc> "wide range of scales from microcontrollers to > cloud-based server farms" > > DR: will let you know if this happens > > MK: Last week Frank discussed microcontroller requirements > ... charter states this already > ... do we need more discussion on this? > > DR: Not sure about Franks proposal > > MK: Frank reported that we should put more focus on > microcontroller requirements > > <kaz> [ the current draft charter says "Servers can be provided > at a wide range of scales from microcontrollers to cloud-based > server farms." ] > > MK: I think we have already a statement there which should be > sufficient > > DR: I agree with sticking to what we have > > Kaz: Yes, it is already mentioned in the charter > > MK: the technical level should not be covered in the charter > > JH: writing minimum footprint in charter is not sensible. > Charter is more about goal setting... supporting also > microcontrollers > ... would see this is covered in current charter > > SK: Frank presented slides about microcontroller market (8 bit > microcontroller et cetera) > ... he was concerned that we don't address this properly > ... I think W3C standardization does not propose a technical > solutions > ... there will be optimized libraries for microcontrollers > > MK: Frank is not here.... do not hear concern... looks like > people are happy with charter as is... > ... microcontrollers are definitely in scope > ... Do you agree that charter is ready for AC review? > > All: no objections > > RESOLUTION: IG believes current WG charter is ready for AC > review > > Beijing Recap > > <kaz> [18]Beijing minutes > > [18] https://www.w3.org/2016/07/13-14-wot-minutes.html > > MK: Last time issues with action items > > Kaz: Should be fixed now > ... please look at minutes which can be found at > [19]https://www.w3.org/2016/07/13-14-wot-minutes.html > ... right in the beginning you will find action itmes > > [19] https://www.w3.org/2016/07/13-14-wot-minutes.html > > Kaz goes over action items > > <yingying_> > [20]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wot-ig/2016Jul/ > 0006.html > > [20] > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wot-ig/2016Jul/0006.html > > YY: we would like to have a joint oneM2M meeting > ... we need to agree on date > ... the proposed dates are: Aug 31 or Sep 7. > ... suggest to have dedicated meeting > > MK: Extra slot before or after normal call? > > YY: We can decide... just the days were proposed > > MK: for me Aug 31 would work > > JH: Could setup a poll (doodle) ? > > Kaz: yes, can use doodle > ... can setup doodle, before and after slot > ... talked to SCXML editor > ... can join our call (about 10 minutes talk) > ... next week? > > MK: in the beginning would be ok? > > SK: action of (Dave and Sebastian) to investigate on the > Optimized JSON Schema no progress yet > > MK: can plugin updates to proposal folder on github > > SK: can share some updates within 2-3 weeks > > DP: Did send email about " to check directly with the > implementers and see who have participated in the PlugFests so > far" > ... got feedback: online plugfest would be good! > > MK: propose to extend template by Taki to know what people > would have available... > > <mkovatsc> > [21]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFests_-_Template_for_Plu > gFest_description > > [21] > https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFests_-_Template_for_PlugFest_description > > Kaz: action by Taki "to generate a template of PlugFest > description" is done? > > MK: Yes... first draft > > TK: there are 2 descriptions > ... first we need collection unit description > ... as part of this (picture, hardware, platform, WoT > functions, ..) > ... every participant describes the "Unit Description" part > ... second we have scenario description > ... think we had 3 scenarios... by linking to unit description > ... that is a first proposal for the template > > MK: Thanks! > ... propose to de-couple unit from scenario description > > TK: Agree > > MK: Do you as participant miss anything? can you fill this out? > > SK: looks good to me > > JH: Yes, ok > > MK: picture could be also logo > ... change "Description of what the scripts does" to > application logic ... without scripting > > TK: good point... > > MK: I am editing the page > > DP: split Unit and Scenario description... two pages? > > <kaz> ACTION: sebastian to take care of the scenario > description [recorded in > [22]http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html#action01] > > [22] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html#action01] > > <trackbot> 'sebastian' is an ambiguous username. Please try a > different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., > sha, skbisch). > > MK: propose individuals provide unit description... and one > builds the scenario description > > SK: can take care of Scenario description > > Kaz: format or style... do we use wiki? > > MK: seemed convenient... might work in future on a better > visualization > ... should start working on PlugFest templates soon.. > > PlugFest Test Case Reports > > <mkovatsc> > [23]https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/plugfest/2016-beijin > g/TestCaseCoverage.xlsx?raw=true > > [23] > https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/plugfest/2016-beijing/TestCaseCoverage.xlsx?raw=true > > MK: please fill out PlugFest Test Case Reports soon > ... send to mailing list or directly to me > ... any remaining issues from Beijing? > > DR: We should work on blog post > > MK: DP started working on it > > DR: timeline? > > MK: planned for end of week > ... Dave, would you be interested in supporting > > DR: Yes, but will be busy next days > > MK: Test wordpress draft or as fallback Google doc > > IG Deliverables > > <kaz> [24]roadmap > > [24] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Roadmap > > MK: planned releases > ... please have a look again.. > ... raise concerns/issues > > <kaz> [25]use cases and requirements > > [25] http://w3c.github.io/wot/wot-ucr.html > > MK: assigned editors... use-cases and requirements (Johannes) > > JH: last addition was month ago.. > ... don't think there are any additions > ... any contributor? > ... propose publishing > > MK: Kaz can you check with Johannes about style and such > > Kaz: yes > > MK: new use-cases will lead updated versions... no final > document > > <kaz> [26]tech landscape > > [26] https://w3c.github.io/wot/landscape.html > > MK: next document is tech-landscape from Soumya > ... Soumya was hard to grasp recently > ... anyone talked to him? > > (none) > > MK: Someone volunteering to finish up the document? > > Kaz: will contact Soumya first > > MK: Yes, will also reach out on mailing list for another > editor... > > <kaz> [27]architecture > > [27] http://w3c.github.io/wot/architecture/wot-architecture.html > > MK: architecture document is very active.. which is very good > ... have one comment.. will send in PR > > <kaz> [28]current practices > > [28] http://w3c.github.io/wot/current-practices/wot-practices.html > > MK: current practices can be frozen.. > > <mkovatsc> trying to fix audio > > MK: Beijing release is frozen.. > ... it is a living document tough > > Kaz: can publish IG notes every 3 months > > MK: Okay.. will publish Beijing version and start working on > Lisbon > > Kaz: once draft documents are fixed, we will talk about > publication again, right? > > MK: will try to fix the document by next week > > JH: should be able to do the same > > TPAC@Lisbon > > MK: Will be a Demo room available on Wednesday? > > Kaz: talked to planning team > ... wondering about size of room > ... bigger rooms are already booked > > MK: Mhh, nots ure > > Kaz: mid-size room in Beijing? > > MK: even smaller is OK.. > > Kaz: 20 people room? > > MK: sounds good to me > > Kaz: difficult to get dedicated room for demo preparation for > whole week > > MK: Early the day or the day before might be also ok > > Kaz: let's have more internal discussions before contacting > TPAC team again > > MK: PlugFest: task overview of the participants? > > DP: think it was about "how" to introduce the demo > > MK: When do participants plan to work on Plugfest? > > Naka: started to work on explanation > > DP: should we have a test-run before TPAC? > > MK: Yes, if possible > > group discussion: ask participants to share information/slides which > are presented @ conferences, etc > > MK: I added "getting started" on github > ... can create "infomaterial" folder? > ... who else has material? > > DR: I have some and linked them from our page > > DP: move everything to this folder? > > DR: Page with links fine also > > MK: Having a pool for figures... editable PPTs et cetera would > be good instead of fixed PDFs > > Kaz: shall we create wiki page for this purpose > > MK: versioning might be good > ... will create "material" folder on github > ... everyone is asked to support and share > > AOB > > <Zakim> kaz, you wanted to remind all of the TPAC registration > :) > > <kaz> [29]TPAC registration site > > [29] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2016/?login > > Kaz: I would like remind you to register for TPAC > > DR: Can you send email? > > Kaz: will do > > <yingying_> [30]flyer creation timeline > > [30] > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wot-comms/2016Jul/0004.html > > YY: one point about flyers > ... very limited time > > MK: Can you send draft top mailinglist > > YY: Dave wanted to review it first? > > DR: Suggest share pointer now, > > [31]https://www.w3.org/Member/wiki/WoT/Flyers > > [31] https://www.w3.org/Member/wiki/WoT/Flyers > > YY: will send email also > > MK: no real flyer yet > > YY: Yes, just content for now > ... Karen's feedback and layout next > ... printing and shipping is costly > > DP: printing in Europe might be another choice > > MK: Was there a deadline? > > YY: yes, 2 weeks > > Next WebConf call > > MK: state chart xml intro > ... Scott Jenson > > DP: resolution of publishing documents could be another topic > > MK: Yes > > Summary of Action Items > > [NEW] ACTION: sebastian to take care of the scenario > description [recorded in > [32]http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html#action01] > > [32] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/27-wot-minutes.html#action01 > > Summary of Resolutions > > 1. [33]IG believes current WG charter is ready for AC review > > [End of minutes] > __________________________________________________________ > > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [34]scribe.perl version > 1.144 ([35]CVS log) > $Date: 2016/07/27 13:40:50 $ > > [34] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > [35] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > > -- Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, WoT, TV, MMI and Geo Tel: +81 3 3516 2504
Received on Monday, 1 August 2016 00:26:38 UTC