Re: Inviting OneM2M to present current status and plans?

I may be able to link up with OneM2M if needed.

Natasha


Natasha Rooney | Technologist, Web and Internet, W3C & IETF | GSMA | nrooney@gsma.com<mailto:nrooney@gsma.com> | +44 (0) 7730 219 765 | @thisNatasha | Skype: nrooney@gsm.org<mailto:nrooney@gsm.org>
Tokyo, Japan


On Sep 5, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr<mailto:Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>> wrote:

oneM2M architecture is quite different from what ETSI had before. oneM2M has advanced a lot in terms of work items like semantics, OMA LwM2M based management etc.

Before proposing the set of standards in August 2014, oneM2M studied not only ETSI M2M model but also TIA, ATIS, CCSA etc. Have a look on the attached doc. I think given the time frame we have, we should consider joint discussions with oneM2M.

Regards
Soumya

Research Engineer, Eurecom, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010
https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta

On 04-09-2015 21:04, Francois Daoust wrote:
On 2015-09-04 13:08, Soumya Kanti Datta wrote:
Dave, Joerg

I'd support this idea of inviting oneM2M into our meetings. oneM2M is not only aligned in terms of discovery and interop but also working significantly on enabling semantics for M2M/IoT. That could be another point of joint discussion. I am very much aware of what they are doing at this point and would further support liaising with them in near future.

Just a small point - in https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/WG/charter.md#groups-outside-w3c - you might think of just putting oneM2M instead of "ETSI and oneM2M" since oneM2M partnership project includes ETSI.

Indeed, OneM2M took over from ETSI M2M a couple of years ago.

Joerg, I had a call with Olivier Hersent, from Actility, who has been actively involved in the development of ETSI M2M (Olivier also shot a series of video tutorials on ETSI M2M [1]) and I would like to suggest that he be invited as well to a future WoT IG teleconference to present some background on design choices made for ETSI M2M. From a logistic perspective, it might make sense to get things in historical order, meaning to have the ETSI M2M presentation before the OneM2M presentation (or perhaps during the same call?). I believe OneM2M made changes to ETSI M2M, and it could be interesting to understand the ins and outs there.

Regards,
Francois.

[1] http://cocoon.actility.com/documentation/ongv2/ETSI_M2M_videos


<oneM2M-TR-0002-Architecture_Analysis_Part_1-V0_2_0.doc><oneM2M-TR-0003-Architecture_Analysis_Part_2-V0_5_0.doc>


This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this email or call +44 207 356 0600 and highlight the error.