Re: Inviting OneM2M to present current status and plans?

oneM2M architecture is quite different from what ETSI had before. oneM2M 
has advanced a lot in terms of work items like semantics, OMA LwM2M 
based management etc.

Before proposing the set of standards in August 2014, oneM2M studied not 
only ETSI M2M model but also TIA, ATIS, CCSA etc. Have a look on the 
attached doc. I think given the time frame we have, we should consider 
joint discussions with oneM2M.

Regards
Soumya

Research Engineer, Eurecom, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010
https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta

On 04-09-2015 21:04, Francois Daoust wrote:
> On 2015-09-04 13:08, Soumya Kanti Datta wrote:
>> Dave, Joerg
>>
>> I'd support this idea of inviting oneM2M into our meetings. oneM2M is 
>> not only aligned in terms of discovery and interop but also working 
>> significantly on enabling semantics for M2M/IoT. That could be 
>> another point of joint discussion. I am very much aware of what they 
>> are doing at this point and would further support liaising with them 
>> in near future.
>>
>> Just a small point - in 
>> https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/WG/charter.md#groups-outside-w3c 
>> - you might think of just putting oneM2M instead of "ETSI and oneM2M" 
>> since oneM2M partnership project includes ETSI.
>
> Indeed, OneM2M took over from ETSI M2M a couple of years ago.
>
> Joerg, I had a call with Olivier Hersent, from Actility, who has been 
> actively involved in the development of ETSI M2M (Olivier also shot a 
> series of video tutorials on ETSI M2M [1]) and I would like to suggest 
> that he be invited as well to a future WoT IG teleconference to 
> present some background on design choices made for ETSI M2M. From a 
> logistic perspective, it might make sense to get things in historical 
> order, meaning to have the ETSI M2M presentation before the OneM2M 
> presentation (or perhaps during the same call?). I believe OneM2M made 
> changes to ETSI M2M, and it could be interesting to understand the ins 
> and outs there.
>
> Regards,
> Francois.
>
> [1] http://cocoon.actility.com/documentation/ongv2/ETSI_M2M_videos
>