Re: Inviting OneM2M to present current status and plans?

I gave a presentation  to one m2m on the semantic sensor network ontology when they just started up, maybe 2years ago.   I, too, would be interested to see where they are going.
Kerry



> On 5 Sep 2015, at 1:46 am, Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr> wrote:
> 
> oneM2M architecture is quite different from what ETSI had before. oneM2M has advanced a lot in terms of work items like semantics, OMA LwM2M based management etc.
> 
> Before proposing the set of standards in August 2014, oneM2M studied not only ETSI M2M model but also TIA, ATIS, CCSA etc. Have a look on the attached doc. I think given the time frame we have, we should consider joint discussions with oneM2M.
> 
> Regards
> Soumya
> 
> Research Engineer, Eurecom, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010
> https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta
> 
>> On 04-09-2015 21:04, Francois Daoust wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-04 13:08, Soumya Kanti Datta wrote:
>>> Dave, Joerg
>>> 
>>> I'd support this idea of inviting oneM2M into our meetings. oneM2M is not only aligned in terms of discovery and interop but also working significantly on enabling semantics for M2M/IoT. That could be another point of joint discussion. I am very much aware of what they are doing at this point and would further support liaising with them in near future.
>>> 
>>> Just a small point - in https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/WG/charter.md#groups-outside-w3c - you might think of just putting oneM2M instead of "ETSI and oneM2M" since oneM2M partnership project includes ETSI.
>> 
>> Indeed, OneM2M took over from ETSI M2M a couple of years ago.
>> 
>> Joerg, I had a call with Olivier Hersent, from Actility, who has been actively involved in the development of ETSI M2M (Olivier also shot a series of video tutorials on ETSI M2M [1]) and I would like to suggest that he be invited as well to a future WoT IG teleconference to present some background on design choices made for ETSI M2M. From a logistic perspective, it might make sense to get things in historical order, meaning to have the ETSI M2M presentation before the OneM2M presentation (or perhaps during the same call?).. I believe OneM2M made changes to ETSI M2M, and it could be interesting to understand the ins and outs there.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Francois.
>> 
>> [1] http://cocoon.actility.com/documentation/ongv2/ETSI_M2M_videos
> 
> <oneM2M-TR-0002-Architecture_Analysis_Part_1-V0_2_0.doc>
> <oneM2M-TR-0003-Architecture_Analysis_Part_2-V0_5_0.doc>