W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Inviting OneM2M to present current status and plans?

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 17:34:18 +0200
Message-ID: <55E9B9FA.9020404@w3.org>
To: Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, "Heuer, Joerg" <joerg.heuer@siemens.com>
CC: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
On 2015-09-04 13:08, Soumya Kanti Datta wrote:
> Dave, Joerg
> I'd support this idea of inviting oneM2M into our meetings. oneM2M is not only aligned in terms of discovery and interop but also working significantly on enabling semantics for M2M/IoT. That could be another point of joint discussion. I am very much aware of what they are doing at this point and would further support liaising with them in near future.
> Just a small point - in https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/WG/charter.md#groups-outside-w3c - you might think of just putting oneM2M instead of "ETSI and oneM2M" since oneM2M partnership project includes ETSI.

Indeed, OneM2M took over from ETSI M2M a couple of years ago.

Joerg, I had a call with Olivier Hersent, from Actility, who has been actively involved in the development of ETSI M2M (Olivier also shot a series of video tutorials on ETSI M2M [1]) and I would like to suggest that he be invited as well to a future WoT IG teleconference to present some background on design choices made for ETSI M2M. From a logistic perspective, it might make sense to get things in historical order, meaning to have the ETSI M2M presentation before the OneM2M presentation (or perhaps during the same call?). I believe OneM2M made changes to ETSI M2M, and it could be interesting to understand the ins and outs there.


[1] http://cocoon.actility.com/documentation/ongv2/ETSI_M2M_videos
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 15:34:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:45 UTC