W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2014

Re: [whatwg] Shouldn't the p tag be omissible before the figure element?

From: Ezequiel Garzón <garzon.lucero@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:54:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMy+yOdBw4BjgF4Oe2iX=dArUGMNtBN19xmM9oe7B-yisjkgHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Thanks for filing the bug report, Simon. I'm thrilled if I can make a
even tiny contribution. It looks like it was already reported on
October 6?

Best regards,

Ezequiel

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:56:45 +0200, Ezequiel Garzón
> <garzon.lucero@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings! I believe the current standards has an oversight in the
>> current rules for omission of the p element's end tag:
>>
>> "A p element's end tag can be omitted if the p element is immediately
>> followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, div, dl, fieldset,
>> footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, hgroup, hr, main, menu,
>> nav, ol, p, pre, section, table, or ul, element, or if there is no
>> more content in the parent element and the parent element is not an a
>> element."
>>
>> Shouldn't the new figure element be in that list?
>>
>> Thanks and cheers,
>>
>> Ezequiel
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26981
>
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 09:55:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:24 UTC