Re: [whatwg] Shouldn't the p tag be omissible before the figure element?

Thanks for filing the bug report, Simon. I'm thrilled if I can make a
even tiny contribution. It looks like it was already reported on
October 6?

Best regards,


On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Simon Pieters <> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:56:45 +0200, Ezequiel Garzón
> <> wrote:
>> Greetings! I believe the current standards has an oversight in the
>> current rules for omission of the p element's end tag:
>> "A p element's end tag can be omitted if the p element is immediately
>> followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, div, dl, fieldset,
>> footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, hgroup, hr, main, menu,
>> nav, ol, p, pre, section, table, or ul, element, or if there is no
>> more content in the parent element and the parent element is not an a
>> element."
>> Shouldn't the new figure element be in that list?
>> Thanks and cheers,
>> Ezequiel
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software

Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 09:55:10 UTC