W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2014

Re: [whatwg] Shouldn't the p tag be omissible before the figure element?

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:16:38 +0200
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, Ezequiel Garzón <garzon.lucero@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.xnib10taidj3kv@simons-mbp>
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:56:45 +0200, Ezequiel Garzón  
<garzon.lucero@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings! I believe the current standards has an oversight in the
> current rules for omission of the p element's end tag:
> "A p element's end tag can be omitted if the p element is immediately
> followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, div, dl, fieldset,
> footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, hgroup, hr, main, menu,
> nav, ol, p, pre, section, table, or ul, element, or if there is no
> more content in the parent element and the parent element is not an a
> element."
> Shouldn't the new figure element be in that list?
> Thanks and cheers,
> Ezequiel


Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 09:17:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:24 UTC