- From: Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:40:35 -0700
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Sangwhan Moon <sangwhan@iki.fi>
W3C Web Bluetooth Community Group http://www.w3.org/community/web-bluetooth/ Use cases & Security model, Explainer, and Specification draft https://github.com/WebBluetoothCG/web-bluetooth On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > Indeed, a Web Bluetooth API would be a great start! > > Also, we are writing standards here, so standardizing the > communication of the data between the devices and UAs would be useful. > > Both would probably fall within the work of a device API group like > http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/ , where media capture was standardized. > > Silvia. > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Sangwhan Moon <sangwhan@iki.fi> wrote: > > Implementing a abstracted API on top of the browser will only work based > > on the > > assumption that the protocol that is used to communicate between the > > host and > > these devices have been standardized. Sadly, I don't think this is the > > case. > > (Correct me if I am wrong) > > > > IMHO what is needed is Bluetooth API that can be used (on top of a sane > > permission > > model) to communicate with Bluetooth devices, and the user friendly > > abstraction should > > be built on top of that. Otherwise there is the problem of browser > > vendors having to > > test and support every single known health band on earth. Pretty > > unlikely to happen. > > > > Sangwhan > > > > Original Message: > >> What I'd you're a long way away from any medical help? > >> > >> In my mind this is part of the larger drive of the web of things (IoT > >> applied to the web) and needs device APIs. This might not be the right > >> group to discuss it in though. > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Silvia. > >> On 13 Sep 2014 10:53, "Erik Reppen" <erik.reppen@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > That's a stronger argument than I would have thought of (and mind you > I'm > >> > just a lurker without anything in the way of influence so don't let me > >> > shoot you down or anything). But audio/video capture is a general > >> > media/communication thing. > >> > > >> > To me it's like the difference between geolocation and having an API > on > >> > top of geolocation that tells you how close you are to a hospital. > You have > >> > the tools for that. Why the desire for a specific API for something > that, > >> > IMO, would really benefit more from consideration by subject matter > >> > experts and devs within that field than general web technology nerds? > >> > > >> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer < > >> > silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Browsers have been dealing with private personal data for a while > now, > >> >> that includes video camera & microphone input, geolocation and more. > Health > >> >> data isn't so different in that respect. There are mechanisms to > deal with > >> >> privacy already in the browser. But indeed: a spec would need to > consider > >> >> such issues. > >> >> > >> >> Best Regards, > >> >> Silvia. > >> >> On 13 Sep 2014 08:42, "delfin" <delfin@segonquart.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hi All: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Use and transmission of private/personal Health data, as other > sensitive personal data, is ruled by law and regional regulations in some > -- or in most of the -- developed countries. > >> >>> > >> >>> Please, take this aspect in consideration. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> - I would not recommend to read health data within a browser. > >> >>> - JSON transferred data, as I understood, might be 'seen' by a > >> >>> semi-experienced user with, for example, the web inspector's > tools a > >> >>> desktop browser has. Not exactly, but nearly. > >> >>> - Not to mention more sophisticated public methods of to collect > >> >>> this JSON/JSONP data. > >> >>> - One might use an existent API or develop a new one for this > >> >>> purpose. The data of an unknown user is viewable by > third-parties. > >> >>> > >> >>> An standard development should take this scenarios in consideration. > >> >>> > >> >>> 1. Laws and regulations in countries/govs referring the use and > >> >>> transfer of private/sensitive data. > >> >>> 2. Open-sourceness and distribution via a "web" browser. > >> >>> > >> >>> Best - > >> >>> -- Delfin Ramirez > >> >>> > >> >>> +34 633 589231 > >> >>> > >> >>> delfin@segonquart.net > >> >>> > >> >>> twitter: delfinramirez > >> >>> > >> >>> IRC: segonquart > >> >>> > >> >>> Skype: segonquart > >> >>> > >> >>> http://segonquart.net, http://delfiramirez.info > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 21:41:32 UTC