W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2014

[whatwg] Shouldn't the p tag be omissible before the figure element?

From: Ezequiel Garzón <garzon.lucero@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:56:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMy+yOcjuwfhSXRKAu+PaqUifoLeGD6h+J_zuOTgGuPLqPzUAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Greetings! I believe the current standards has an oversight in the
current rules for omission of the p element's end tag:

"A p element's end tag can be omitted if the p element is immediately
followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, div, dl, fieldset,
footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, hgroup, hr, main, menu,
nav, ol, p, pre, section, table, or ul, element, or if there is no
more content in the parent element and the parent element is not an a

Shouldn't the new figure element be in that list?

Thanks and cheers,

Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 07:57:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:24 UTC