- From: Roger Hågensen <rescator@emsai.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:06:02 +0100
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 2014-11-13 18:19, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: > AFAIK, all of these interface details lie outside the scope of the > HTML specification (and rightly so, IMHO). If you need a standard > symbol for bookmarks I suggest to use U+1F516 BOOKMARK, which looks > like this „🔖“. Then don't spec it but advise or suggest it. Even the bookmark example at https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/semantics.html#link-type-bookmark says "A user agent could determine which permalink applies to which part of the spec" thereby acting as a advisory hint/best practice suggestion (note the use of "could"). I also tested the example code (with doctype html obviously) and the browser behaviouir is still the same, rel="bookmark" is simply ignored. In that case shouldn't rel="bookmark" be removed from the WHATWG HTML spec to reflect actual use? -- Roger "Rescator" Hågensen. Freelancer - http://www.EmSai.net/
Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 01:06:30 UTC