W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2014

Re: [whatwg] New approach to activities/intents

From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 20:01:22 +0100
To: rescator@emsai.net, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Message-ID: <87egte25tp.fsf@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Roger Hågensen <rescator@emsai.net> writes:

> A link element in the header, maybe call it <link rel="share" 
> href="http://example.com/article/12345/" />
> or <link rel="share" /> if the current url (or the canonical url link if 
> present) should be used, although I guess in a way rel="share" will 
> probably replace the need to use rel="canonical" in the long run.

I do not understand. Why should one invent a rel value (“share”) that
conveys the same semantics as an already existing one (“canonical”) ?

Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 19:01:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:26 UTC