- From: Brett Zamir <brettz9@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:59:03 +0800
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 6/10/2014 3:05 AM, whatwg-request@lists.whatwg.org wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 15:41:32 -0400 > From: timeless@gmail.com > To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Inline pronounce element > Message-ID: <20140608194132.7602328.57406.381@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Tab wrote: >> This is already theoretically addressed by <link rel=pronunciation>, >> linking to a well-defined pronunciation file format. Nobody >> implements that, but nobody implements anything new either, of course. > Brett wrote: >> I think it'd be a lot easier for sites, say along the lines of >> Wikipedia, to support inline markup to allow users to get a word >> referenced at the beginning of an article, for example, pronounced >> accurately. > Wikipedia can easily use data:... if it needs to.? > And wiktionary already has a solution... > > A better challenge is explaining to a screen reader if "read" is "rEd" or "rehD" in a page where you want to define and use both. I claim that this can be addressed with id= on the link and a ref= (or similar) on the use.? > > But before User Agents should be asked to support this, I'd want to see real sites showing an interest.? > > Screen Reader vendors seem ok with the current state - they sell the pronunciation tables... My thought was that browsers could expose some interface for getting the word pronounced even if the user was not using a screen reader. And without a site needing to have supplied it's own JavaScript to apply styling and buttons around such tags so that when clicked, a `SpeechSynthesisUtterance` would be made. Brett
Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 22:59:35 UTC