W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2013

Re: [whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:36:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLY74cRMrKioh589dodDNmB5GbjuEQRxa3PBVK5sOWvYKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, "whatwg@lists.whatwg.org" <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jussi Kalliokoski <
jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> wrote:

> Path is also too generic even in the context of graphics. If we later on
> want to add a path object for 3-dimensional paths, you end up with Path and
> Path3D? Yay for consistency. Path2D would immediately inform what
> dimensions we're dealing with and also that this is to do with graphics,
> and thus sounds like a good name to me.

Sounds good to me.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 21:36:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:14 UTC