W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2013

Re: [whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:36:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLY74cRMrKioh589dodDNmB5GbjuEQRxa3PBVK5sOWvYKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, "whatwg@lists.whatwg.org" <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jussi Kalliokoski <
jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> wrote:

> Path is also too generic even in the context of graphics. If we later on
> want to add a path object for 3-dimensional paths, you end up with Path and
> Path3D? Yay for consistency. Path2D would immediately inform what
> dimensions we're dealing with and also that this is to do with graphics,
> and thus sounds like a good name to me.
>

Sounds good to me.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 21:36:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:14 UTC