Re: [whatwg] <imgset> responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

Am 13.11.2013 14:52 schrieb John Mellor:
> <style>
> @media (max-width: 19.99em) {
>      .artdirected { content: replaced image-set(128px; attr(srcs-smallicon));
> }
> }
> @media (min-width: 20em) {
>      .artdirected { content: replaced image-set(100% (30em) 50% (50em) 33%;
> attr(srcs-flexwidth)); }
> }
> </style>
> ...
> <img class="artdirected" src="fallback.jpg"
>       srcs-smallicon="i64.jpg 64, i128.jpg 128, i256.jpg 256"
>       srcs-flexwidth="160.jpg 160, 320.jpg 320, 640.jpg 640, 1280.jpg 1280,
> 2560.jpg 2560">
>
> (note that the above is a maximally complex example, incorporating art
> direction, viewport-switching and dpr-switching; most normal cases would be
> simpler than this)

Looks great to me. Just verbose enough to be understood by average 
authors (as I am one), perfectly maintainable, and as powerful as src-N.

Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 22:53:34 UTC