[whatwg] contenteditable, <em> and <strong>

On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:16:04 +0100, Spartanicus  
<spartanicus.3 at ntlworld.ie> wrote:
> CSS table layouts share all of the many drawbacks of HTML table layouts,
> except for the false semantics (one of the least significant issues
> IMO).

I agree, CSS needs something like the XUL flexible box model.


> Afaics this is off topic for this list, so I'm not going to add further
> to this thread spin off.

It prolly is, oh well.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 04:18:37 UTC