- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:46:59 -0500
Hallvord R M Steen wrote: > > you have an opinion that few if any others are rallying behind. > > Perhaps because it seems too obvious to discuss? It doesn't seem obvious to anyone over on the microformat list, AFAICT. If it is that critical, why are all those to whom it is obvious making the case on uf-discuss? > You could go back to the list of markup samples, and tell us > for each of them what you feel the actual semantic of that > should be, and how it should be handled visually or in form > submission. Once you've tried to understand the complexity > involved we'll have more common ground for the discussion. Unfortunately, this aspect is not my highest priority. The unfortunate thing is I'll probably just have to knowingly generate invalid HTML in some cases because I know the browsers will handle it, as will so many others who are using semantic markup in HTML who bump into the limitations imposed by the specification writer. FWIW. -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2007 02:46:59 UTC