- From: Markus Schütz <mschuetz@potree.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:15:57 -0700
- To: public-webvr@w3.org
Thats a compromise I could live with, provided that it won't be a too intrusive overlay. What about giving developers an option to somehow of influence the placing of the overlay? Like, a north/south option to cope with different kinds of scenes and user interfaces. Am 21/07/2016 um 13:11 schrieb Brandon Jones: > I know that this has been a topic of intense interest in the > community, and so although it's early we wanted to share an overview > of the Chrome VR and Security team's current plan for WebVR in > relation to HTTP and HTTPS domains. > > On all domains we're planning on having some UI that displays the > current domain and security indicators when you enter VR. On HTTPS > domains that UI will fade out after a moment. On HTTP domains some > form of the UI will persist for the entirety of the VR session. We're > still working on the exact design of the UI but we're being careful to > take into consideration comfort, readability, and ensuring it doesn't > permenantly obscure parts of the scene. We'll share more as we become > more confident about the design. > > Thank you to everyone in the community that has worked with us to help > understand your various use cases. It's been invaluable to informing > this decision. And thank you for demonstrating how passionate this > fledgling community is about VR on the web! It's been encouraging to > see, as one post noted, just how many people give a damn. :) > > --Brandon
Received on Friday, 22 July 2016 20:38:37 UTC