public-webrtc@w3.org from November 2024 by subject

[mediacapture-fromelement] The value of `getSettings().frameRate` when captureStream(0) (#102)

[mediacapture-main] Does the channelCount attribute support a value greater than 2? (#1021)

[mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020)

[mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#25)

[mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308)

[mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Address click-jacking concerns (#41)

[mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#40)

[mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] How capturer web applications can know whether forwarding is working/useful (#46)

[mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#45)

[mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)

[mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is setting a specific zoom level part of the MVP? (#44)

[mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Should a web page allow to select specific types of event to be forwarded and not others (#47)

[mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Supporting zoom via gesture forwarding (#43)

[mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission for captured surface control APIs (#48)

[mediacapture-surface-control] Tab capture control (#49)

[mediacapture-transform] Fire a stopped event on VideoTrackGenerator if all downstream tracks are stopped (#117)

[mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116)

[mediacapture-transform] What is the expected timing of MSTP video frame enqueuing with other track events (configurationchange, applyConstraints promise resolution) (#115)

[minutes] November 19 WebRTC WG meeting

[mst-content-hint] Should the spec provide guideline on the default degradation preference to use for capture tracks? (#60)

[webrtc-encoded-transform] Licencia

[webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230)

[webrtc-pc] Clarify order of events when the SCTP transport is closed (#3022)

[webrtc-pc] Clarify that datachannel close is reflected remotely (#3021)

[webrtc-pc] Codec filter in SDP should consider lower level-id as subsets of greater level-id (#3020)

[webrtc-pc] DataChannel connected step needs to queue a task (#3015)

[webrtc-pc] How should be populated codecs capabilities fmtp lines? (#3024)

[webrtc-pc] Missing resolution attributes from simulcast `addTransceiver` `sendEncodings` API enabling (#3019)

[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add remote track channelCount

[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Allow level-id to be different in codec match

[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Filter codecs preferences on transceiver direction

[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Queue a task for the SCTP transport connected steps.

[webrtc-pc] Reconsider replaceTrack's blocking on the operations queue. (#3017)

[webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Add RTCRtpTransportProcessor based API

[webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Packet sender receiver worker api

[webrtc-rtptransport] Support L4S RFC8888 (#82)

[webrtc-stats] Update definitions of corruption detection probabilities to match IETF standard (#790)

[webrtc-svc] RTCRtpSender.getCapabilities() should include scalability_modes in returned codec list (#105)

[webrtc-svc] scalabilityMode should be marked as existing only for video encodings (#106)

Call for Adoption (CfA): "Captured Surface Control"

Call for expressions of interest: Abs-capture-timestamp

Request for Agenda Items: WEBRTC WG December 10 meeting

Summary of the CfA for "Captured Surface Control"

Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)

Last message date: Friday, 29 November 2024 22:53:04 UTC